The Return of David Cameron: Implications for UK Foreign Policy

In a surprising move, former UK Prime Minister David Cameron has been appointed as the new foreign secretary by Rishi Sunak.

While Cameron brings undeniable strengths to the role, his controversial legacy and various vulnerabilities may overshadow the potential benefits.

This article explores the potential impact of Cameron’s return on UK foreign policy, considering both the advantages and challenges he brings to the table.

Strengths:

Cameron’s experience as a former prime minister positions him as a seasoned diplomat comfortable on the world stage.

His congenial relationships with world leaders can potentially strengthen the UK’s global ties, particularly at a time of heightened international tensions in the Middle East, Ukraine, and the United States.

Many countries crucial to the UK would welcome Cameron’s return as a heavyweight and moderate foreign secretary, potentially fostering stability in the diplomatic arena.

Consensual Tone and Moderation:

Cameron’s consensual tone, highlighted during his tenure as prime minister in a coalition government with the Liberal Democrats, may reassure traditional moderate Tories.

This could be crucial at a time when the party grapples with internal divisions and hard-right rhetoric. However, the extent to which this benefits Sunak’s broad voter appeal remains uncertain.

Disadvantages:

Brexit Legacy:

One of the major challenges Cameron faces is his association with the Brexit referendum and his advocacy for the Remain campaign. This could potentially alienate Brexit supporters who remember him as the prime minister responsible for the referendum that significantly impacted the UK’s international relations.

Mixed Legacy in International Relations:

Cameron’s international legacy is mixed, particularly concerning the Middle East.

Criticism has been directed at his intervention in Libya, with a 2016 Foreign Affairs Select Committee report highlighting shortcomings in intelligence and strategy.

His failed attempt to engage in military strikes against Bashar al-Assad in Syria further damaged his authority.

China Policy Shift:

Cameron’s close association with the ‘golden era’ policy of courting China may pose challenges, especially given the UK’s shift in viewing China as a strategic challenge rather than an economic opportunity.

Clarifying his stance on this shift will be crucial for Cameron in navigating China-related issues.

Controversies and Public Perception:

The controversy surrounding Cameron’s advocacy for Greensill Capital and his appointment to the House of Lords may raise concerns about transparency and public trust.

The manner of his appointment, a former prime minister returning to the Cabinet, may be viewed as anachronistic & contribute to growing public skepticism.

Conclusion:

The return of David Cameron as the new foreign secretary undoubtedly brings strengths, including diplomatic experience and moderate leadership.

However, his controversial legacy, particularly regarding Brexit and international interventions, coupled with potential challenges in addressing evolving foreign policy issues, poses uncertainties for the UK’s diplomatic future.

As Cameron takes on this pivotal role, his ability to navigate these challenges will determine the impact of his return on the nation’s foreign policy.